Skip header and navigation

20 records – page 1 of 1.

Badea, A; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Muhajarine, N; Minion, J; Miller, L; Howell-Spooner, B. In real world settings, what is the validity of Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs) in identifying SARS-CoV-2 and how well do they predict disease? 2022 Jan 12, Document no.: EOC211201 RR Table. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. (CEST table). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc420

Badea, A; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Muhajarine, N; Minion, J; Miller, L; Howell-Spooner, B. In real world settings, what is the validity of Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs) in identifying SARS-CoV-2 and how well do they predict disease? 2022 Jan 12, Document no.: EOC211201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 15 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc421

Miller, L. & Howell-Spooner, B. In real world settings, what is the validity of RATs in identifying COVID-19 (sensitivity, specificity), and how well do they predict disease (positive and negative predictive values)? 2021 Dec 29, Document no.: EOC211201 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 56 p. (CEST evidence search report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc416

Miller, Lukas. Howell-Spooner, Brianna. Omicron Variant: In real world settings, what is the validity of RATs in identifying COVID-19 (sensitivity, specificity), and how well do they predict disease (positive and negative predictive values)? 2022 Jan 05. Document no.: EOC211201-02 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 12 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc418

Mueller, M; Fox, L. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 26. Document no.: EOC211126 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 45 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc402

Badea, A; Groot, G; Hernandez-Ronquillo, L; Fox, L; Mueller, M. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 30, Document no.: EOC211126 RR Table. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. (CEST Table). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc404

Badea, A; Groot, G; Hernandez-Ronquillo, L; Fox, L; Mueller, M. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 30. Document no.: EOC211126 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 14 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc405

Howell-Spooner, B. What frequency of repeat population screening will be required? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042202-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 40 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc53

Wang, H; Reeder, B; Howell-Spooner, B. What frequency of repeat population screening will be required? 2020 Apr 25; Document no.: LAB042202 RR. In: COVID19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 4 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc65

Dalidowicz, M; Mueller, M. What is the evidence around testing for asymptomatic COVID on the day of surgery? 2022 May 25, Document no.: EOC220505 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 32 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc486

Badea, A; Groot, G; Reeder, B; Dalidowicz, M; Mueller, M. What is the evidence around testing for asymptomatic COVID on the day of surgery? 2022 Jun 06, Document no.: EOC220505 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. (CEST table). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc495

Badea, A; Groot, G; Reeder, B; Dalidowicz, M; Mueller, M. What is the evidence around testing for asymptomatic COVID on the day of surgery? 2022 Jun 06, Document no.: EOC220505 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 11 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc497

Howell-Spooner, B; Mueller, M. What laboratory surveillance testing strategies are effective for COVID-19 in school settings? 2020 Aug 25; Document no.: PH082501-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc162

Badea, A; Muhajarine, N; Howell-Spooner, B; Mueller, M. What laboratory surveillance testing strategies are effective for COVID-19 in school settings? 2020 Aug 27; Document no.: PH082501 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 23 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc166

Duncan, V; Howell-Spooner, B. What proportion of healthcare workers are rt-PCR positive and IgM or IgG positive? 2020 Jun 2; Document no.: LAB040802v3-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 22 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc112

Vanstone, J; Reeder, B; Duncan, V; Howell-Spooner, B. What proportion of healthcare workers are rt-PCR positive and IgM or IgG positive? 2020 Jun 2; Document no.: LAB040802v3 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 10 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc113

Duncan, V. What sampling method is most appropriate for population testing? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042201-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 14 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc52

Vanstone, J; Reeder, B; Duncan, V. What sampling method is most appropriate for population testing? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 5 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc64

Young, C; Fox, L. What surveillance strategy is most effective for COVID-19 testing in healthcare workers? 2020 Nov 6; Document no.: EOC110401-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 30 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc203

Newaz, S; Lee, S; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Young, C; Fox, L. What surveillance strategy is most effective for COVID-19 testing in healthcare workers? 2020 Nov 10; Document no.: EOC110401 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 26 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc217

20 records – page 1 of 1.