Skip header and navigation

13 records – page 1 of 2.

Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC012001 RR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
patients with COVID-19 at high risk of critical care admission or death: An observational cohort study. J
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC012001 RR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific clinical prediction tool for COVID-19 patients at this time.
The 4C Mortality tool and associated risk calculator is likely the most validated prediction tool currently available.
Many tools exist and may be applied with caution, as they should be validated in the local context.
There are many patient factors included in different tools when calculating risk of disease severity.
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Vanstone, J; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Feb 4; Document no.: EOC012001 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC012001 RR Table
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Modelling The proposed model accurately predicts total and critical-care hospital utilization. The model
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC012001 RR Table
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Vanstone, J; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Feb 4; Document no.: EOC012001 RR Table. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST table)
Related Documents
Documents

EOC012001 RR Table

Download File
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC012001-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
January 25, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
patients). Review ID: EOC012001-01 ESR Complete Date: January 25, 2021 Subject(s): Critical Care
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC012001-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
January 25, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Jan 25; Document no.: EOC012001-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 87 p. (CEST evidence search report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
CC210301 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
March 31, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Cochrane Library • Comparison of Tele-Critical Care Versus Usual Care On ICU Performance (TELESCOPE
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
CC210301 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
March 31, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Decision Making
Treatment
Facilities
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 1 2-3 days
Cite As
Young, C; Ellsworth, C. How to deliver remote ICU care for COVID-19 patients to avoid/prevent transfer from smaller communities to tertiary care hospitals. 2021 Mar 31; Document no.: CC210301 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 18 p. (CEST evidence search report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
CC210301 RR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
April 6, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
supporting the use of telemedicine-supported critical care, all studies were performed pre-COVID-19 pandemic
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
CC210301 RR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
April 6, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Key Findings
· Tele-ICU services are provided either by existing staff within the network to smaller centers, or outsourced to larger networks or independent firms · The impact of tele-ICU adoption can result in a decrease in ICU mortality as large as 32% · The impact of tele-ICU adoption of length of stay is mixed, with some studies reporting a significant decrease, while others report a small, but statistically insignificant decrease · The degree of impact of tele-ICU adoption is linked to several factors such as yearly admission rates, location (urban vs. rural) and level of authority given to the tele-ICU team leading to increased positive impacts.
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Decision Making
Facilities
Treatment
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 1 2-3 days
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Reeder, B; Young, C; Ellsworth, C; Howell-Spooner, B. How to deliver remote ICU care for COVID-19 patients to avoid/prevent transfer from smaller communities to tertiary care hospitals. 2021 Apr 6; Document no.: CC210301 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 13p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC220201 ESR
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 10, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
years’ worth of data, so some findings may report critical care outcomes for shorter durations (we
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC220201 ESR
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 10, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Healthcare Services
Subject
Clinical Presentation
Critical Care
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment
Long Covid
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
NICU
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Miller, L; Mueller, M. What are the one year outcomes for ICU COVID patients? 2022 Feb 10. Document no.: EOC220201 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 46 p. (CEST evidence search report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC220201 RR Table
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 18, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
of Critical Care Patients Post-COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC220201 RR Table
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 18, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Healthcare Services
Subject
Clinical Presentation
Critical Care
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment
Long Covid
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
NICU
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Badea, A; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Miller, L; Mueller, M. What are the one year outcomes for ICU COVID patients? 2022 Feb 18, Document no.: EOC220201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. (CEST table).
Related Documents
Documents

EOC220201 RR Table

Download File
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC220201 RR
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 18, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
with critical care has been developed, called the ABCDE bundle4. The bundle consists of 5 elements – Airway
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC220201 RR
Question Submitted
February 7, 2022
Date Completed
February 18, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
6-month to 1 year survival rates of critical COVID-19 patients are similar to those of non-COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU
COVID-19 patients who have survived intensive care (ICU) admission are at risk of developing both post intensive care syndrome (PICS) and Long COVID. PICS includes impairments in physical, cognitive and psychological dimensions
Long-term survival follow up of COVID patients indicates that they experience similar levels of impairments in physical, cognitive and psychological dimensions as historical non-COVID reference populations.
The most common long-term impairments reported by COVID patients are persistent dyspnea/breathlessness, general weakness/fatigue and ongoing psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression and PTSD
Category
Healthcare Services
Subject
Clinical Presentation
Critical Care
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment
Long Covid
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
NICU
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Badea, A; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Miller, L; Mueller, M. What are the one year outcomes for ICU COVID patients? 2022 Feb 18, Document no.: EOC220201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 11 p. (CEST rapid review report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC011101-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 11, 2021
Date Completed
January 11, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
, 2021 Interview Date: January 8, 2021 Complete Date: January 11, 2021 Subject(s): Critical Care
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC011101-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 11, 2021
Date Completed
January 11, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Clinical Management
Healthcare Services
Subject
Critical Care
Treatment
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 2 One week (7 days)
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Young, C. What are the outcomes of ECMO and COVID, particularly in small centers? 2021 Jan 11; Document no.: EOC011101-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 46 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC011101 RR
Question Submitted
January 11, 2021
Date Completed
January 13, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC011101 RR
Question Submitted
January 11, 2021
Date Completed
January 13, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
Overall, data are insufficient to recommend for or against the use of ECMO in patients with COVID-19 and refractory hypoxemia.
The best available evidence points to an overall combined mortality rate of 46% among COVID-19 patients placed on ECMO (n=331). This rate is similar to the overall 40% mortality rate for extracorporeal life support in pulmonary failure. However, mortality rates among COVID-19 patients on ECMO range widely due to patient factors, site specific factors, and small sample sizes in available studies.
Recommendations for strategies and patient indications/contraindications are available to help guide centres intending to offer ECMO to COVID-19 patients.
Category
Clinical Management
Healthcare Services
Subject
Critical Care
Treatment
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 2 One week (7 days)
Cite As
Vanstone, J; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Young, C. What are the outcomes of ECMO and COVID, particularly in small centers? 2021 Jan 13; Document no.: EOC011101 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 7 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail

13 records – page 1 of 2.