Skip header and navigation

15 records – page 1 of 2.

Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC220301 SBAR
Question Submitted
March 1, 2022
Date Completed
May 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC220301 SBAR
Question Submitted
March 1, 2022
Date Completed
May 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Notes
This is not a regular rapid review. It was decided to write this SBAR instead.
Category
Healthcare Services
Subject
Vaccines
Vaccination
Public Health
Decision Making
Health Personnel
Infection Prevention and Control
Population
All
Clinical Setting
Community
Primary care
Public Health
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Rowein S, Singh S, Habbick M, Mehdiyeva K, Miller L, Gagneur, A, Groot G, Neudorf C, Camillo CA, Tokhmafshan, F, Muhajarine N. Motivational Interviewing for Vaccine Hesitancy. May 2022. Document no.: [12.1]. CoVaRR-Net Public Health, Health Systems, Social Policy Team, c2022.
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC033002-01 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2020
Date Completed
March 30, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
/pmc/articles/PMC7062433/pdf/192e264.pdf 8. Huh S. How to train the health personnel for protecting
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC033002-01 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2020
Date Completed
March 30, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Notes
This was never assigned to an RR
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Healthcare Services
Subject
Facilities
Health Personnel
Population
All
Priority Level
Level 3 completed within 2-3 days
Cite As
Howell-Spooner, B. What approaches are effective to limit the spread of COVID-19 infection for healthcare workers in health facilities and how does it impact their mental health? 2020 Mar 30; Document no.: EOC033002-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 20 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC100801 RR
Question Submitted
October 8, 2020
Date Completed
October 19, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC100801 RR
Question Submitted
October 8, 2020
Date Completed
October 19, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
· Well established that older individuals, particularly those with pre-existing conditions are at increased risk of severe disease and/or complications with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and volunteers should take this into consideration · No other evidence specific to healthcare workers or volunteers to guide age restriction policies
Category
Administration
Subject
Risk
Elderly
Facilities
Health Personnel
Population
Aged (80+)
Clinical Setting
Community
Primary care
Public Health
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Miller, L; Mueller, M. What are the age restrictions for healthcare workers/volunteer? 2020 Oct 19; Document no.: EOC100801 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 8 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC100801-01 ESR
Question Submitted
October 8, 2020
Date Completed
October 13, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC100801-01 ESR
Question Submitted
October 8, 2020
Date Completed
October 13, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Subject
Risk
Elderly
Facilities
Health Personnel
Population
Aged (80+)
Clinical Setting
Community
Primary care
Public Health
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Miller, L; Mueller, M. What are the age restrictions for healthcare workers/volunteers? 2020 Oct 13; Document no.: EOC100801-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 5 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC072701-01 ESR
Question Submitted
July 27, 2020
Date Completed
July 29, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC072701-01 ESR
Question Submitted
July 27, 2020
Date Completed
July 29, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Healthcare Services
Subject
Health Personnel
Facilities
Decision Making
Population
All
Clinical Setting
Other
All
Priority Level
Level 4 completed within 1 week
Cite As
Fox, L; Young C; Howell-Spooner, B; What are the existing policies for the re-deployment or deployment of healthcare workers whose regular work has been disrupted by COVID-19 in high-resource clinical settings? 2020 Jul 29; Document no.: EOC072701-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 39 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC072701 RR
Question Submitted
July 27, 2020
Date Completed
July 29, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
-allocat* or surge staff*).ab,ti,kf. 668187 2 exp Health Personnel/ or (physician* or doctor? or nurse
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC072701 RR
Question Submitted
July 27, 2020
Date Completed
July 29, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
Physician and nursing staff members can be redeployed from various clinical areas, but in particular non-acute or elective practice areas such as ambulatory settings and surgical practices.
Providing patient-care in new clinical areas can be restructured into a task-based format that utilizes the skills already possessed by redeployed clinicians and staff.
Medical students, residents, internationally trained medical graduates and other health professionals such as respiratory therapists and pharmacists should also be considered for redeployment to high-need areas.
Scope of practice limitations, practice permit approvals and licensing may pose as potential barriers to being able to optimize our healthcare workforce in a surge.
Efficient but effective training should be provided to all staff that have volunteered for redeployment, in preparation of the next surge.
The safety of all health professionals should be ensured throughout the redeployment process.
Category
Administration
Healthcare Services
Subject
Health Personnel
Facilities
Decision Making
Population
All
Clinical Setting
Other
All
Priority Level
Level 4 completed within 1 week
Cite As
Radu, L; Badea, A; Groot, G; Fox, L; Howell-Spooner, B; Young, C. What are the existing policies for the re-deployment or deployment of healthcare workers whose regular work has been disrupted by COVID-19 in high-resource clinical settings? 2020 Jul 29; Document no.: EOC072701 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 16 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC211202 RR
Question Submitted
December 23, 2021
Date Completed
February 17, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
exp *Health Personnel/ or exp *Attitude of Health Personnel/ or exp *Patient Care Team
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC211202 RR
Question Submitted
December 23, 2021
Date Completed
February 17, 2022
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
Healthcare worker (HCW) well-being has been significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic around the world, with significantly increased rates of burnout, PTSD, anxiety and depression leading to increased absenteeism, willingness to work and decreased worker retention
Many of the pre-existing programs for HCW well-being focused on single, isolated incidents, such as patient safety incidents. Some adaptation of programs aimed at military or disaster relief are more readily translatable to the COVID-19 pandemic context
The measurement of HCW well-being relies on self-reported measures and related outcomes (e.g. absenteeism, willingness to work, retention) and as such, most interventions are evaluated using self-reported satisfaction surveys
Organizational level recommendations focus on the provision of adequate staffing and equipment for work-life balance, as well as a supportive and safe work environment free of stigma of help-seeking behaviors
In order for successful program interventions, leadership must be genuine, transparent and accessible at all levels
Interventions such as education and training are recommended not only for HCW well-being, but also for disease specific and unfamiliar task knowledge
In the face of lockdowns and social distancing guidelines, the fostering of connectedness and peer support communities, including self-efficacy and self-advocacy, and including plans for remaining connected with isolating workers and reintegration programs has been found to be highly important to HCW
The centralization of support services into a wellness/resource hub increases awareness and accessibility as acceptability, and where possible the design of rest areas should promote well-being
Individual interventions providing education, training and psychological support are generally well received, but accessibility and meaningful use are heavily dependent on organizational support
Category
Administration
Healthcare Services
Subject
Mental Health
Health Personnel
Decision Making
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Badea A; MacFadden, M; Bishop, S; Dalidowicz M; Stojanovic V. What are the interventions to ameliorate the impacts of the pandemic on Healthcare workers? 2022 Feb 17, Document no.: EOC211202 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2022. 20 p. (CEST rapid review report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
PPE110203-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 10, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
PPE110203-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 10, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Subject
Face Masks
Health Personnel
Population
All
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. What evidence is available regarding degradation of N95 respirators/masks? 2020 Nov 10; Document no.: PPE110203-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 16 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
PPE110203 RR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 20, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
PPE110203 RR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 20, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
Key Findings
Laboratory testing of expired masks maintain an acceptable filtration performance with less than 2% failing testing in a study of nearly 4,000 masks from 93 lots
Another study assessing stockpiled N95 masks in Taiwan found acceptable filtration up to 13 years post storage
Guidelines indicate that expired N95 respirators should be used before resorting to extended use/reuse
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Subject
Face Masks
Health Personnel
Population
All
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. What evidence is available regarding degradation of N95 respirators/masks? 2020 Nov 20; Document no.: PPE110203 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
PPE110201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 6, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
is the shortage of protective equipment for health personnel. N95 masks are considered one of the essential
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
PPE110201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 2, 2020
Date Completed
November 6, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Personal Protective Equipment
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Subject
Face Masks
Health Personnel
Population
Other
Clinical Setting
Other
all clinical (and non) settings
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. What is the evidence to support the reprocessing and re-use of N95 respirators by healthcare workers? 2020 Nov 6; Document no.: PPE110201-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 28 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail

15 records – page 1 of 2.