Skip header and navigation

27 records – page 1 of 3.

Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC111201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 12, 2020
Date Completed
November 23, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC111201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
November 12, 2020
Date Completed
November 23, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Clinical Management
Subject
Treatment
Population
All
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Mueller, M; Young, C. Are probiotics effective for prevention or therapy of respiratory tract infections in all ages? 2020 Nov 23; Document no.: EOC111201-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 7 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC111201 RR
Question Submitted
November 12, 2020
Date Completed
November 25, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC111201 RR
Question Submitted
November 12, 2020
Date Completed
November 25, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
· Systematic reviews with pooled analysis found a statistical difference between probiotic and placebo groups in days of respiratory tract illness, number of antibiotic prescriptions and days of missed work/school · The evidence for the use of probiotics while statistically significant, is of low quality with high levels of heterogeneity · No significant difference in SAEs between groups, side effects of probiotic use mainly mild GI symptoms
Category
Clinical Management
Subject
Treatment
Population
All
Priority Level
Level 4 Three weeks (21 days)
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Mueller, M; Young, C. Are probiotics effective for prevention or therapy of respiratory tract infections in all ages? 2020 Nov 25; Document no.: EOC111201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 13 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC012001-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
January 25, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
clinical management of hospitalized patients in order to achieve a resilience of medical resources
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC012001-01 ESR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
January 25, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Jan 25; Document no.: EOC012001-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 87 p. (CEST evidence search report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC012001 RR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC012001 RR
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific clinical prediction tool for COVID-19 patients at this time.
The 4C Mortality tool and associated risk calculator is likely the most validated prediction tool currently available.
Many tools exist and may be applied with caution, as they should be validated in the local context.
There are many patient factors included in different tools when calculating risk of disease severity.
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Vanstone, J; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Feb 4; Document no.: EOC012001 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC012001 RR Table
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Table
Review Code
EOC012001 RR Table
Question Submitted
January 19, 2021
Date Completed
February 4, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Triage
Priority Level
Level 3 Two weeks (14 days)
Cite As
Vanstone, J; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Fox, L. Are there validated clinical prediction tools of which Covid-19 inpatients are most probable to require ICU level care? 2021 Feb 4; Document no.: EOC012001 RR Table. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 15 p. (CEST table)
Related Documents
Documents

EOC012001 RR Table

Download File
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC051201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
May 12, 2020
Date Completed
May 13, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC051201-01 ESR
Question Submitted
May 12, 2020
Date Completed
May 13, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Clinical Management
Subject
Personal Protective Equipment
Aerosols
Priority Level
Level 3 completed within 2-3 days
Cite As
Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. Do neck or back coverings provide additional protection to gown and N95 mask when conducting an aerosol generating procedure? 2020 May 13; Document no.: EOC051201-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 18 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC051201 RR
Question Submitted
May 12, 2020
Date Completed
May 15, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
EOC051201 RR
Question Submitted
May 12, 2020
Date Completed
May 15, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Key Findings
· Small simulation studies have demonstrated potential contamination of neck and back area · Many associations recommend neck coverage, or if unavailable to ensure sanitation/washing of exposed skin after doffing PPE · Several warnings that increasing amount of PPE increases chances of contamination and may decrease level of compliance
Category
Infection Prevention and Control
Clinical Management
Subject
Personal Protective Equipment
Aerosols
Priority Level
Level 3 completed within 2-3 days
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. Do neck or back coverings provide additional protection to gown and N95 mask when conducting an aerosol generating procedure? 2020 May 15; Document no.: EOC051201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 9 p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
CC210301 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
March 31, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
CC210301 ESR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
March 31, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Decision Making
Treatment
Facilities
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 1 2-3 days
Cite As
Young, C; Ellsworth, C. How to deliver remote ICU care for COVID-19 patients to avoid/prevent transfer from smaller communities to tertiary care hospitals. 2021 Mar 31; Document no.: CC210301 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 18 p. (CEST evidence search report).
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
CC210301 RR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
April 6, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Document Type
Rapid Review
Review Code
CC210301 RR
Question Submitted
March 30, 2021
Date Completed
April 6, 2021
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
Critical Care
Key Findings
· Tele-ICU services are provided either by existing staff within the network to smaller centers, or outsourced to larger networks or independent firms · The impact of tele-ICU adoption can result in a decrease in ICU mortality as large as 32% · The impact of tele-ICU adoption of length of stay is mixed, with some studies reporting a significant decrease, while others report a small, but statistically insignificant decrease · The degree of impact of tele-ICU adoption is linked to several factors such as yearly admission rates, location (urban vs. rural) and level of authority given to the tele-ICU team leading to increased positive impacts.
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Critical Care
Decision Making
Facilities
Treatment
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 1 2-3 days
Cite As
Badea, A; Groot, G; Reeder, B; Young, C; Ellsworth, C; Howell-Spooner, B. How to deliver remote ICU care for COVID-19 patients to avoid/prevent transfer from smaller communities to tertiary care hospitals. 2021 Apr 6; Document no.: CC210301 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 13p. (CEST rapid review report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC052102-01 ESR
Question Submitted
May 21, 2020
Date Completed
May 21, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
/NCT04382235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2020.03.005 4 [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical
Document Type
Evidence Search Report
Review Code
EOC052102-01 ESR
Question Submitted
May 21, 2020
Date Completed
May 21, 2020
Status
3. Completed
Research Team
EOC
Category
Administration
Clinical Management
Subject
Ventilation
Health Planning
Population
All
Clinical Setting
ICU
Priority Level
Level 3 completed within 2-3 days
Cite As
Miller, L; Dalidowicz, M. In similar jurisdictions experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic, what is the proportion of patients receiving non-invasive ventilation versus those receiving intermittent mandatory ventilation? 2020 May 21; Document no.: EOC052102-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 19 p. (CEST evidence search report)
Related Documents
Documents
Less detail

27 records – page 1 of 3.