Duncan, V. Is the IgM or IgG immune response protective? 2020 Apr 8; Document no.: LAB040803-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 13 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc38
Wang, H; Reeder, B; Duncan, V; Is the IgM or IgG immune response protective? 2020 Apr 11; Document no.: LAB040803 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 6 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc48
Duncan, V. What sampling method is most appropriate for population testing? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042201-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 14 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc52
Howell-Spooner, B. What frequency of repeat population screening will be required? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042202-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 40 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc53
Miller, L; Young, C. What is the best evidence to guide the sequence or priority of re-opening each type of healthcare service and how have the closures impacted patients? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: EOC042202-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 5 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc60
Vanstone, J; Reeder, B; Duncan, V. What sampling method is most appropriate for population testing? 2020 Apr 23; Document no.: LAB042201 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 5 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc64
Wang, H; Reeder, B; Howell-Spooner, B. What frequency of repeat population screening will be required? 2020 Apr 25; Document no.: LAB042202 RR. In: COVID19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 4 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc65
Badea, A; Reeder, B; Groot, G; Miller, L; Young, C. What is the best evidence to guide the sequence or priority of re-opening each type of healthcare service and how have the closures impacted patients? 2020 Apr 24; Document no.: EOC042202 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 11 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc59
Miller, L; Young, C. What is the best evidence to guide the sequence or priority of re-opening each type of healthcare service and how have the closures impacted patients? 2020 May 6; Document no.: EOC042202-02 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 31 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc83
Young, C; Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. What factors can be used to identify negative PCR tests that are ‘false negatives’? 2020 May 21; Document no.: EOC052101-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 42 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc95
Badea, A; Reeder, B; Young, C; Dalidowicz, M; Miller, L. What factors can be used to identify negative PCR tests that are ‘false negatives’? 2020 May 25; Document no.: EOC052101 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 12 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc96
Duncan, V; Howell-Spooner, B. What proportion of healthcare workers are rt-PCR positive and IgM or IgG positive? 2020 Jun 2; Document no.: LAB040802v3-01 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 22 p. (CEST evidence search report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc112
Vanstone, J; Reeder, B; Duncan, V; Howell-Spooner, B. What proportion of healthcare workers are rt-PCR positive and IgM or IgG positive? 2020 Jun 2; Document no.: LAB040802v3 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2020. 10 p. (CEST rapid review report) https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc113
Howell-Spooner, B., Young, C.. What is the evidence for the effectiveness of universal mask use in the pediatric population?? 2021 Sep 28, Document no.: EOC210901 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 25 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc374
Badea, A; Groot, G; Muhajarine, N; Howell-Spooner, B; Young, C. What is the evidence for the effectiveness of universal mask use in the pediatric population? 2021 Sep 30, Document no.: EOC210901 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. (CESTtable). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc377
Badea, A; Groot, G; Muhajarine, N; Howell-Spooner, B; Young, C. What is the evidence for the effectiveness of universal mask use in the pediatric population? 2021 Sep 30, Document no.: EOC210901 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 14 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc379
Mueller, M; Fox, L. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 26. Document no.: EOC211126 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 45 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc402
Badea, A; Groot, G; Hernandez-Ronquillo, L; Fox, L; Mueller, M. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 30, Document no.: EOC211126 RR Table. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. (CEST Table). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc404
Badea, A; Groot, G; Hernandez-Ronquillo, L; Fox, L; Mueller, M. What are the risks associated with repeated exposure to Ethylene Oxide from ongoing use of the Abbott Panbio AG COVID-19 Nasal swabs? 2021 Nov 30. Document no.: EOC211126 RR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 14 p. (CEST rapid review report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc405
Miller, L. & Howell-Spooner, B. In real world settings, what is the validity of RATs in identifying COVID-19 (sensitivity, specificity), and how well do they predict disease (positive and negative predictive values)? 2021 Dec 29, Document no.: EOC211201 ESR. In: COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Reviews [Internet]. SK: SK COVID Evidence Support Team, c2021. 56 p. (CEST evidence search report). https://covid19evidencereviews.saskhealthauthority.ca/en/permalink/coviddoc416
